Case before the New Jersey Supreme Court on October 10.
TRENTON – The Division on Civil Rights filed an amicus brief with the New Jersey Supreme Court that supports the position of a 73-year-old college dean who is suing Mercer County Community College for not extending her contract after 25 years of employment. Oral argument is scheduled for the case on October 10 at 10 a.m.
Filed with the Supreme Court on October 28, the Division’s brief contends Mercer County Community College is incorrect in its argument that a 1985 amendment to the state Law Against Discrimination (LAD) – an amendment that allows employers to refuse to hire job candidates over age 70 – means it did not unlawfully discriminate in failing to renew the contract of Rose Nini, longtime Dean of the college’s Division of Corporate and Community Programs.
The Division’s brief contends that the non-renewal of Nini’s contract in 2005 is not protected by the so-called over-70 exception in the LAD, as Mercer County Community College contends, but instead is tantamount to a firing by the college, and that such an action is therefore subject to the LAD’s discrimination protections.
In attempting to defend its action via the over-70 exception, the Division’s brief asserts, Mercer County Community College is relying on a “misplaced and overly broad interpretation” of the 1985 amendment. If such an interpretation were to be adopted, it “would severely hamper” the state’s ability to combat discrimination.
“It is disingenuous for (Mercer County Community College) to characterize the termination of Nini’s contract as simply a failure to employ in the context of the amendment,” charges the Division’s brief. “Clearly, to continuously renew her contract for 25 years and decide not to renew it only after she reached the age of 70 is not only invidious age discrimination, but ‘mocks the beneficial goals of the LAD.’ ”
According to the Division’s brief, Nini was a member of the Mercer County Community College Board of Trustees before she began working at the college as an executive assistant to the president in 1979. In 1982, she became Dean of the Division of Corporate and Community Programs, a position she held until her final contract expired on June 30, 2005.
Although Nini was provided three ostensibly performance-related reasons for the non-renewal of her contract, her position is that the reasons were pretexts, and that the actual reason was her age.
Her civil complaint against the college, its board of trustees and President Robert Rose, filed in September 2005, charged age-based discrimination. The trial court held, however, that state law permitted an employer to decline to renew the employment contract of any employee 70 years or age or older.
Nini appealed, arguing that the non-renewal of her employment contract represented an unlawful termination or discharge. The Appellate Division agreed and reversed the trial court.
The college then petitioned the state Supreme Court for certification on the issue of the Appellate panel’s interpretation of the over-70 exception, and certification was granted.
Senior Deputy Attorney General Anne Marie Kelly and Assistant Attorney General Andrea M. Silkowitz are handling the Nini amicus brief on behalf of the state.
No comments »